Ca_Law | Corpus

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 984

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 984

There is no privilege under this article in: (a) A proceeding brought by or on behalf of one spouse against the other spouse. (b) A proceeding between a surviving spouse and a person who claims through the deceased spouse, regardless of whether such claim is by testate or intesta

Open

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 985

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 985

There is no privilege under this article in a criminal proceeding in which one spouse is charged with: (a) A crime committed at any time against the person or property of the other spouse or of a child of either. (b) A crime committed at any time against the person or property of

Open

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 986

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 986

There is no privilege under this article in a proceeding under the Juvenile Court Law, Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 200) of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.

Open

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 987

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 987

There is no privilege under this article in a criminal proceeding in which the communication is offered in evidence by a defendant who is one of the spouses between whom the communication was made.

Open

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 990

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 990

As used in this article, “physician” means a person authorized, or reasonably believed by the patient to be authorized, to practice medicine in any state or nation.

Open

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 991

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 991

As used in this article, “patient” means a person who consults a physician or submits to an examination by a physician for the purpose of securing a diagnosis or preventive, palliative, or curative treatment of his physical or mental or emotional condition.

Open

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 992

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 992

As used in this article, “confidential communication between patient and physician” means information, including information obtained by an examination of the patient, transmitted between a patient and his physician in the course of that relationship and in confidence by a means

Open

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 993

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 993

As used in this article, “holder of the privilege” means: (a) The patient when he has no guardian or conservator. (b) A guardian or conservator of the patient when the patient has a guardian or conservator. (c) The personal representative of the patient if the patient is dead.

Open

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 994

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 994

Subject to Section 912 and except as otherwise provided in this article, the patient, whether or not a party, has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another from disclosing, a confidential communication between patient and physician if the privilege is claimed by:

Open

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 995

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 995

The physician who received or made a communication subject to the privilege under this article shall claim the privilege whenever he is present when the communication is sought to be disclosed and is authorized to claim the privilege under subdivision (c) of Section 994.

Open

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 996

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 996

There is no privilege under this article as to a communication relevant to an issue concerning the condition of the patient if such issue has been tendered by: (a) The patient; (b) Any party claiming through or under the patient; (c) Any party claiming as a beneficiary of the pat

Open

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 997

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 997

There is no privilege under this article if the services of the physician were sought or obtained to enable or aid anyone to commit or plan to commit a crime or a tort or to escape detection or apprehension after the commission of a crime or a tort.

Open

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 998

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 998

There is no privilege under this article in a criminal proceeding.

Open

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 999

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 999

There is no privilege under this article as to a communication relevant to an issue concerning the condition of the patient in a proceeding to recover damages on account of the conduct of the patient if good cause for disclosure of the communication is shown.

Open

FBI v. Fazaga

case_law | United States Federal | Supreme Court of the United States

FBI v. Fazaga

Section 1806(f) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978—providing a procedure under which a trial-level court or other authority may consider the legality of electronic surveillance conducted under FISA and order specified forms of relief—does not displace the state…

Open

FBI v. Fikre

case_law | United States Federal | Supreme Court of the United States

FBI v. Fikre

The Government failed to meet its burden to demonstrate that Mr. Fikre’s removal from the Government’s No Fly List mooted his 42 U. S. C. §1983 case because its declaration did not disclose the conduct that landed Mr. Fikre on the No Fly List and did not ensure that he would not…

Open

FCC v. Consumers’ Research

case_law | United States Federal | Supreme Court of the United States

FCC v. Consumers’ Research

The universal-service contribution scheme does not violate the Constitution’s nondelegation doctrine; Congress sufficiently guided and constrained the discretion that it lodged with the Federal Communications Commission to implement that scheme, and the FCC has retained all deci…

Open

FCC v. Prometheus Radio Project

case_law | United States Federal | Supreme Court of the United States

FCC v. Prometheus Radio Project

The Federal Communications Commission’s 2017 decision to repeal or modify three of its media ownership rules was not arbitrary or capricious for purposes of the Administrative Procedure Act.

Open

FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

case_law | United States Federal | Supreme Court of the United States

FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

Plaintiffs lack Article III standing to challenge the Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory actions regarding mifepristone.

Open

FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co.

case_law | United States Federal | Supreme Court of the United States

FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co.

Retailers who would sell a new tobacco product if not for the FDA’s denial order may seek judicial review of that order under 21 U. S. C. §387l(a)(1).

Open

FDA v. Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC

case_law | United States Federal | Supreme Court of the United States

FDA v. Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC

The Fifth Circuit erred in setting aside as arbitrary and capricious the FDA’s orders denying respondents’ applications for authorization to market new e-cigarette products pursuant to The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009; the Fifth Circuit also relied o…

Open