Ca_Law

labor_relations_guidance | California

Decision A540E – Sacramento City Teachers Association, CTA/NEA and California Teachers Association (Reilly)

  • UIDca_perb_mou_public_sector:https-perb-ca-gov-decision-a540e
  • CitationN/A
  • Court / bodyCalifornia Public Employment Relations Board
  • Decision dateN/A
  • CollectionCA_PERB_MOU_PUBLIC_SECTOR
  • SourceOriginal

Text

Home
|
Decisions
|
A540E
Decision A540E – Sacramento City Teachers Association, CTA/NEA and California Teachers Association (Reilly)
SA-CO-708-E and SA-CO-709-E
Decision Date: July 6, 2026
Decision Type: Administrative Appeal (Non-Precedential)
Description:
Charging Party Patrick Reilly requested special permission to appeal the denials of his motions for recusal pursuant to PERB Regulation 32155(e). On May 1, 2026, Reilly filed identical motions in PERB Case Nos. SA-CO-708-E and SA-CO-709-E for recusal of a Board agent in PERB’s Office of the General Counsel. Reilly’s motions cited PERB Regulation 32155(b). On May 15, 2026, the Board agent subject to recusal denied both motions. Reilly appealed.
Disposition:
In a non-precedential decision, the Board denied Reilly’s request for special permission to appeal the denials of his motion for recusal in PERB Case Nos. SA-CO-708-E and SA-CO-709-E. The Board found that granting the interlocutory appeal of the Board agent’s order denying Reilly’s motions would not effectuate the purposes of the Educational Employment Relations Act.
Decision Headnotes
No items found

Retrieval chunks

  • #1

    Home | Decisions | A540E Decision A540E – Sacramento City Teachers Association, CTA/NEA and California Teachers Association (Reilly) SA-CO-708-E and SA-CO-709-E Decision Date: July 6, 2026 Decision Type: Administrative Appeal (Non-Precedential) Description: Charging Party Patrick Reilly requested special per…