Facebook, Inc. v. Amalgamated Bank

Summary

Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Text

PRELIMINARY PRINT 
Volume 604 U. S. Part 1 
Pages 4–5 
OFFICIAL REPORTS 
OF 
THE SUPREME COURT 
November 6, 2024 
REBECCA A. WOMELDORF 
reporter of decisions 
Page Proof Pending Publication
NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before 
the bound volume is published. Users are requested to notify the Reporter 
of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, 
[email protected], of any typographical or other formal errors.

4 Cite as: 604 U. S. 4 (2024) 
Per Curiam 
FACEBOOK, INC. v. AMALGAMATED BANK 
on petition for writ of certiorari to the united 
states court of appeals for the ninth circuit 
No. 23–980. Argued November 6, 2024—Decided November 22, 2024 
Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 87 F. 4th 934. 
Per Curiam. 
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently 
granted. 
It is so ordered. 
Kannon K. Shanmugam argued the cause for petitioners. 
With him on the briefs were William T. Marks, Matteo Godi, 
Audra J. Soloway, Kristina A. Bunting, Joshua S. Lipshutz, 
Katherine Moran Meeks, Michael J. Kahn, and Patrick J. 
Fuster. 
Kevin K. Russell argued the cause for respondents. With 
him on the brief were Daniel H. Woofter, Jason C. Davis, 
Salvatore J. Graziano, Jeremy P . Robinson, Luke O. Brooks, 
Joseph D. Daley, and Darryl J. Alvarado. 
Kevin J. Barber argued the cause for the United States as 
amicus curiae urging affrmance. With him on the brief 
were Solicitor General Prelogar, Deputy Solicitor General 
Stewart, Megan Barbero, Michael A. Conley, Jeffrey A. 
Berger, and Emily True Parise.* 
*Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were fled for the Chamber of 
Commerce of the United States of America et al. by Judson O. Littleton, 
Tyler S. Badgley, and Kevin Carroll; for Law Professors et al. by An-
thony J. Franze, Kolya D. Glick, and William T. Sharon; for the Society 
for Corporate Governance by Christopher E. Duffy; and for the Washing-
ton Legal Foundation by Lyle Roberts, George E. Anhang, Cory L. An-
drews, and John M. Masslon II. 
Briefs of amici curiae urging affrmance were fled for Financial Econo-
mists by Charles Gerstein, Jason Harrow, Leonard Barrack, Gerald J. 
Rodos, and William C. Fredericks; for Institutional Investors by Hyland 
Hunt, Ruthanne M. Deutsch, Jonathan Gardner, Lauren A. Ormsbee, 
Page Proof Pending Publication

Cite as: 604 U. S. 4 (2024) 5 
Per Curiam 
Carol C. Villegas, and Michael P . Canty; for Securities Law Scholars by 
John Paul Schnapper-Casteras and Andrew L. Zivitz; and for Technology 
Industry Policy Advocates et al. by Elena B. Roberts and Adam D. 
Hollander. 
Page Proof Pending Publication

Page Proof Pending Publication
Reporter’s Note 
The attached opinion has been revised to refect the usual publication 
and citation style of the United States Reports. The revised pagination 
makes available the offcial United States Reports citation in advance of 
publication. The syllabus has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions 
for the convenience of the reader and constitutes no part of the opinion of 
the Court. A list of counsel who argued or fled briefs in this case, and 
who were members of the bar of this Court at the time this case was 
argued, has been inserted following the syllabus. Other revisions may 
include adjustments to formatting, captions, citation form, and any errant 
punctuation. The following additional edits were made: 
None

Retrieval chunks

• #1

  PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 604 U. S. Part 1 Pages 4–5 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT November 6, 2024 REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions Page Proof Pending Publication NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requested to notif…

• #2

  John Paul Schnapper-Casteras and Andrew L. Zivitz; and for Technology Industry Policy Advocates et al. by Elena B. Roberts and Adam D. Hollander. Page Proof Pending Publication Page Proof Pending Publication Reporter’s Note The attached opinion has been revised to refect the usual publication and citation style…