Ca_Law | Corpus

Ca_Law

English version - Review requirements before the first employee starts work

labor_form_guidance | California | California Labor Commissioner's Office / DLSE

English

Open
English/Vietnamese

labor_form_guidance | California | California Labor Commissioner's Office / DLSE

English/Vietnamese

Open
Equal Pay Act

labor_form_guidance | California | California Labor Commissioner's Office / DLSE

Equal Pay Act

Open
Equal pay cases handout

labor_form_guidance | California | California Labor Commissioner's Office / DLSE

Equal pay cases handout

Open
Erlinger v. United States

case_law | United States Federal | Supreme Court of the United States

Erlinger v. United States

The Fifth and Sixth Amendments require a unanimous jury to make the determination beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant’s past offenses were committed on separate occasions for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U. S. C. § §924(e)(1).

Open
Escondido v. Emmons

case_law | United States Federal | Supreme Court of the United States

Escondido v. Emmons

The Ninth Circuit failed to conduct the analysis required by this Court’s precedents in determining whether two Escondido police officers were entitled to qualified immunity.

Open
Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue

case_law | United States Federal | Supreme Court of the United States

Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue

The application of the Montana Constitution’s “no-aid” provision to a state program providing tuition assistance to parents who send their children to private schools discriminated against religious schools and the families whose children attend or hope to attend them in violati…

Open
Esteras v. United States

case_law | United States Federal | Supreme Court of the United States

Esteras v. United States

A district court considering whether to revoke a defendant’s term of supervised release may not consider 18 U. S. C. §3553(a)(2)(A), which covers retribution vis-à-vis the defendant’s underlying criminal offense.

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1

This code shall be known as the Evidence Code.

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 10

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 10

The singular number includes the plural; and the plural, the singular.

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 100

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 100

Unless the provision or context otherwise requires, these definitions govern the construction of this code.

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1000

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1000

There is no privilege under this article as to a communication relevant to an issue between parties all of whom claim through a deceased patient, regardless of whether the claims are by testate or intestate succession or by inter vivos transaction.

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1001

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1001

There is no privilege under this article as to a communication relevant to an issue of breach, by the physician or by the patient, of a duty arising out of the physician-patient relationship.

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1002

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1002

There is no privilege under this article as to a communication relevant to an issue concerning the intention of a patient, now deceased, with respect to a deed of conveyance, will, or other writing, executed by the patient, purporting to affect an interest in property.

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1003

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1003

There is no privilege under this article as to a communication relevant to an issue concerning the validity of a deed of conveyance, will, or other writing, executed by a patient, now deceased, purporting to affect an interest in property.

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1004

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1004

There is no privilege under this article in a proceeding to commit the patient or otherwise place him or his property, or both, under the control of another because of his alleged mental or physical condition.

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1005

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1005

There is no privilege under this article in a proceeding brought by or on behalf of the patient to establish his competence.

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1006

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1006

There is no privilege under this article as to information that the physician or the patient is required to report to a public employee, or as to information required to be recorded in a public office, if such report or record is open to public inspection.

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1007

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1007

There is no privilege under this article in a proceeding brought by a public entity to determine whether a right, authority, license, or privilege (including the right or privilege to be employed by the public entity or to hold a public office) should be revoked, suspended, termi

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1010

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1010

As used in this article, “psychotherapist” means a person who is, or is reasonably believed by the patient to be: (a) A person authorized to practice medicine in any state or nation who devotes, or is reasonably believed by the patient to devote, a substantial portion of their ti

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1010.5

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1010.5

A communication between a patient and an educational psychologist, licensed under Chapter 13.5 (commencing with Section 4989.10) of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code, shall be privileged to the same extent, and subject to the same limitations, as a communication bet

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1011

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1011

As used in this article, “patient” means a person who consults a psychotherapist or submits to an examination by a psychotherapist for the purpose of securing a diagnosis or preventive, palliative, or curative treatment of his mental or emotional condition or who submits to an ex

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1012

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1012

As used in this article, “confidential communication between patient and psychotherapist” means information, including information obtained by an examination of the patient, transmitted between a patient and his psychotherapist in the course of that relationship and in confidence

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1013

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1013

As used in this article, “holder of the privilege” means: (a) The patient when he has no guardian or conservator. (b) A guardian or conservator of the patient when the patient has a guardian or conservator. (c) The personal representative of the patient if the patient is dead.

Open
Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1014

statute | California | California Legislative Counsel

Evidence Code - EVID - EVID § 1014

Subject to Section 912 and except as otherwise provided in this article, the patient, whether or not a party, has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another from disclosing, a confidential communication between patient and psychotherapist if the privilege is claime

Open