Corpus browser
179663 records-
Open
DV-730 - Order to Renew Domestic Violence Restraining Order
DV-730
Order to Renew Domestic Violence Restraining Order
-
Open
DV-805 - Proof of Enrollment for Batterer Intervention Program
DV-805
Proof of Enrollment for Batterer Intervention Program
-
Open
DV-815 - Batterer Intervention Program Progress Report
DV-815
Batterer Intervention Program Progress Report
-
Open
DV-820 - Prohibited Items Finding and Orders (Domestic Violence Prevention)
DV-820
Prohibited Items Finding and Orders (Domestic Violence Prevention)
-
Open
DV-830 - Noncompliamce With Firearms and Ammunition Order, or Warrant
DV-830
Noncompliamce With Firearms and Ammunition Order, or Warrant
-
Open
DV-850 - Permission to Have Firearm or Ammunition for Work (Domestic Violence Prevention)
DV-850
Permission to Have Firearm or Ammunition for Work (Domestic Violence Prevention)
- Open
-
Open
DV-901 - Attachment to Order Transferring Wireless Phone Account
DV-901
Attachment to Order Transferring Wireless Phone Account
-
Open
Dawson v. Steager
Dawson v. Steager
By taxing the federal pension benefits of U. S. Marshals Service retiree Dawson, while exempting from taxation the pension benefits of certain state and local law enforcement officers, West Virginia unlawfully discriminates against Mr. Dawson as 4 U. S. C. §111 forbids.
-
Open
DeVillier v. Texas
DeVillier v. Texas
Owners of property north of U. S. Interstate Highway 10 adversely affected by the flood evacuation barrier constructed by Texas should be permitted on remand to pursue their Takings Clause claims through the cause of action available under Texas law.
-
Open
Decision 3034H – Regents of the University of California
Home | Decisions | 3034H Decision 3034H – Regents of the University of California SF-CE-1437-H Decision Date: July 1, 2026 Decision Type: PERB Decision Description: AFSCME requested health and safety records pertaining to employees at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)…
-
Open
Decision 3035M – City of Huntington Park
Home | Decisions | 3035M Decision 3035M – City of Huntington Park LA-CE-1515-M Decision Date: July 2, 2026 Decision Type: PERB Decision (Non-Precedential) Description: Charging Party Huntington Park General Employees Association (HPGEA) alleged that Respondent City of Huntington…
-
Open
Decision 3036E – Sacramento City Teachers Association, CTA/NEA and California Teachers Association (Reilly)
Home | Decisions | 3036E Decision 3036E – Sacramento City Teachers Association, CTA/NEA and California Teachers Association (Reilly) SA-CO-705-E and SA-CO-707-E Decision Date: July 6, 2026 Decision Type: PERB Decision (Non-Precedential) Description: Charging Party Patrick Reilly…
-
Open
Decision 3037H – Teamsters Local 2010 (Morin)
Home | Decisions | 3037H Decision 3037H – Teamsters Local 2010 (Morin) SA-CO-292-H Decision Date: July 6, 2026 Decision Type: PERB Decision (Non-Precedential) Description: Carlo Morin alleged that Teamsters Local 2010 breached its duty of fair representation in its handling of a…
-
Open
Decision A540E – Sacramento City Teachers Association, CTA/NEA and California Teachers Association (Reilly)
Home | Decisions | A540E Decision A540E – Sacramento City Teachers Association, CTA/NEA and California Teachers Association (Reilly) SA-CO-708-E and SA-CO-709-E Decision Date: July 6, 2026 Decision Type: Administrative Appeal (Non-Precedential) Description: Charging Party Patric…
-
Open
Decisions
Decisions
-
Open
Delaware v. Pennsylvania
Delaware v. Pennsylvania
Recommendations in the Special Master’s First Interim Report concluding that the escheatment of certain financial instruments relevant to this case should follow the Federal Disposition Act are adopted to the extent they are consistent with the Court’s opinion, and Delaware’s ob…
-
Open
Delligatti v. United States
Delligatti v. United States
The knowing or intentional causation of injury or death, whether by act or omission, necessarily involves the “use” of “physical force” against another person within the meaning of 18 U. S. C. §924(c)(3)(A).
-
Open
Denezpi v. United States
Denezpi v. United States
The Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar successive prosecutions of distinct offenses arising from a single act, even if a single sovereign prosecutes them.
-
Open
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz
A consumer may sue a federal agency under 15 U. S. C. §§1681n and 1681o for defying the terms of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
-
Open
Department of Education v. Brown
Department of Education v. Brown
Respondents lack Article III standing to assert a procedural challenge to the student-loan debt-forgiveness plan adopted by the Secretary of Education pursuant to Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003 (HEROES Act).
-
Open
Department of Education v. California
Department of Education v. California
The District Court’s order preventing the termination of education-related grants is construed as an appealable preliminary injunction. Because the Government is likely to succeed in showing that the District Court lacked jurisdiction under the Administrative Procedure Act to or…
-
Open
Department of Education v. Louisiana
Department of Education v. Louisiana
The Government's applications for a partial stay of the preliminary injunctions issued by District Courts in Louisiana and Kentucky against the enforcement of the Department of Education's new rule implementing Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 are denied, as the Gove…
-
Open
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.
The Department of Homeland Security’s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.
-
Open
Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam
Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam
As applied here, 8 U. S. C. §1252(e)(2)—which limits the habeas review obtainable by an alien detained for expedited removal—does not violate the Suspension or Due Process Clauses.